<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Getting into the christmas spirit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ronanpalliser.ie/blog/2009/12/07/getting-into-the-christmas-spirit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ronanpalliser.ie/blog/2009/12/07/getting-into-the-christmas-spirit/</link>
	<description>A regularly-updated blog of a photographer in Dublin, Ireland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:46:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graeme</title>
		<link>http://www.ronanpalliser.ie/blog/2009/12/07/getting-into-the-christmas-spirit/comment-page-1/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>Graeme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 14:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronanpalliser.ie/blog/?p=2343#comment-163</guid>
		<description>Good to see someone as anal as me about trying out new stuff before a big event!!

I&#039;ve done a few weddings on an informal basis, and have had very good results using my Canon 70-200mm f/4.0L IS.  While the image stabilisation is good to get a couple of stops of anti-camera-shake, you do have to beware that it can&#039;t compensate for movement of your subject.  I know *you* know what you&#039;re doing, but *I* got a few shots of blurry people simply because the slower shutter speed afforded by IS couldn&#039;t freeze their movement (Of course, done creatively, this can add something to the shot, but isn&#039;t always as desired!)

Loving the blog,
Graeme</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see someone as anal as me about trying out new stuff before a big event!!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve done a few weddings on an informal basis, and have had very good results using my Canon 70-200mm f/4.0L IS.  While the image stabilisation is good to get a couple of stops of anti-camera-shake, you do have to beware that it can&#8217;t compensate for movement of your subject.  I know *you* know what you&#8217;re doing, but *I* got a few shots of blurry people simply because the slower shutter speed afforded by IS couldn&#8217;t freeze their movement (Of course, done creatively, this can add something to the shot, but isn&#8217;t always as desired!)</p>
<p>Loving the blog,<br />
Graeme</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

